In a nail-biting landmark court case, judges passed a mixed verdict after considering whether the Prince and his soldiers were guilty of violating the 4th amendment when they rudely barged in on several local households demanding they try on shoes and marry him. Both the defense and prosecution were unafraid to ask the really tough questions, bringing in several key witnesses from the surrounding realm. The defense maintained that the Prince actually knocked and would not have forced anyone to marry him under duress; the prosecution found evidence to the contrary.

This trial was conducted during Law Class by Dr. Judy Stetcher.

Amendment 4 – Search and Seizure. Ratified 12/15/1791.

The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no Warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by Oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized.

Witnesses are sworn in:

Neighbors make their case:

The Prince testifies:

The Judges listen carefully: